Author notes
This topic and it's questions were given to me by my philosophy teacher as a topic for a term paper. We were given various questions and told to pick one. I chose this one because it's something I've always wished I could do. What would you do?
What's your opinion? If you could go back in time and unlearn anything what would it be? Would you choos ignorance or knowledge? Why?
Comments
-
thoughtful
Please take me to task if my assumption is wrong, but i get the feeling from reading you're piece is that you went through some of the things personally. I don't think that you can separate the two, as they go hand in hand without a positive there could not be a negative.
I don't think that a person can unlearn anything unless he/she has a total lobotomy, and if that was the solution, then that person would be incapable of ever gaining even a modicum of knowledge ever.
Don't know if this makes any sense, i don't claim to be a thinker or a philosopher,it just seems to make sense to me.
beginning: 4, language: 4, plot: 3, ending: 4, dialog: 4, characters: 1.
-
Pretty good except that I would still choose knowledge
I would choose knowledge. It is true that with knowledge comes unwanted things. However; knowledge is responsibility simply because that knowledge is power, and thats not my opinion...its fact. Forgetting the bad in the past is good as long as you know what you have learned from it will better yourself moraly. If I were to better myself moraly, I would also use my experiece to help others. Its what most people do without realizing it. Ignorance leeds to many negitive things. With ignorance you dont see truth in the world, which is a big factor in learning as you grow older. A term might be, "A reality check". I applaud your effort on this essay. The essay itself is poweful and a great addition to my "keep in mind" list =P
beginning: 3, language: 3, plot: 5, ending: 4, dialog: 4, characters: 3.
-
Brilliant!
I love the writing style- insightful, passionate and honest. This one seeks the truth and has no fear in finding it. I am truly moved and inspired by the authors words. The beginning draws you into the story from an empathic and inquisitive perspective- from the first line you are given the sense of an uncompromisingly self assured philisophical stance that suggests that knowledge of atrocity is the reason it continues to exist and that ignorance of atrocity preserves innocence. It raises many questions. Is innocence's loss inevitable? Is knowlege only ever used in the interests of self gain, power and domination? Why must peace, love and equality be percieved as a utopic ideal within a world of injustice, hatred and war? Why must people, like the author, make impassioned pleas for sanity in amongst the chaotic throng of human suffering? Surely we should all have learned from the mistakes of our predecessors?... and so many more.
I bet the philosophy teacher was well pleased with this offering. Well Done!
To answer the question though: If I could unlearn anything- I wouldn't. I'd be too scared I'd lose a part of 'me'- surely we are the sum of everything we've ever learned? Maybe we can reclaim our innocence through knowlege- once we all realise the folly of handing responsibility of our thought and action to others. I would choose ignorance AND knowledge- same as good and evil; right and wrong, etc- we need it all to learn what we need to most.

beginning: 4, language: 5, plot: 5, ending: 5.

