Let's Talk About Anne McCafferey.

So the Twilight rants inspired me to make my own literary complaint.1

Now, first, please understand. I think she's an amazing worldbuilder. The Pern books were among the first novels I ever read as a kid and they were very influential on my creative development. I'd be lying if I said I didn't like Pern.2

But the older I get, the more I realize that, while she may be an excellent world-builder, she is a *terrible* writer.3

Continuity? What continuity? She edits details, character traits, and events from book to book to suit the current book's needs. There are several references to Moreta being a Benden Weyrwoman, but then she writes Moreta: Dragonlady of Pern... and now Moreta is Fort Weyrwoman! Lytol was an ex-green rider in Dragonflight, but Larth suddenly became a brown dragon in all books thereafter. Let's not even go into watch-whers and what her son is doing to them, after all the times she sent lawyers after people who DARED have browns Impressing women or to invent new dragon colors in their Pern roleplays. Hypocrisy there? All, apparently!4

I honestly can't tell if she just makes things up as she goes along without thinking about what she's written before, or if she just changes things as the world evolves in her head and figures no one will notice the discrepancy or care?5

The thing that gets me is that whenever I voice these complaints, inevitably someone will pop up pulling the "you're just jealous/come back when you're as rich and famous as she is" card. As if fame and fortune were the acid test of skill and/or talent. I repeat, the Pern books are very entertaining. I like them. But that doesn't prevent me from realizing that, in literary terms, they suck hugely. All of the above aside, her characterization is hideously inconsistent. I'd be hard-pressed to pick out a major character in the 9th Pass who isn't a Gary Stu/Mary Sue, and let's not even talk about Dragonsdawn or First Fall. She seems to be incapable of creating real, flawed-but-genuine people. Either they're totally flawed or they're totally good. There are a very few exceptions (T'bor) but they're generally secondary or tertiary characters. And the worst thing is, if they move into the primary position (like Piemur) they often change for the worse in bizarre ways.6

Things also just have a way of Happening in Pern. One of the things that was good about the earlier Pern books is that they had a lot of conflict. But as things went along, the plots got more and more predictable, the conflict drained away, and it ended up being the same book over and over again. I got especially tired of the endlessly reiterated Romance Subplot. I began to hope, every time I found a new Pern book in the library, that this time, maybe THIS time (please?) she might have forgone the romance thing.7

Needless to say, I have been bitterly disappointed.8

I stuck with it, though, loyally. I suppose mostly out of curiosity. I finally gave up on it, though, after reading her son's first Pern book. I checked out the first two but couldn't bring myself to read the second one after the first. The butchery of Pern canon has officially progressed to rape -- with the Dragonlady's stamp of approval!9

I'm sorry, Ma'am. I had a lot of fun fantasizing about being a bronze (or blue, or brown) rider fighting Thread and such when I was 12-15 or so, but it's just gotten too weird for me. We've gotten to the point where Tupper Weyr (a parody Pern RP on AOL back in the mid-to-late 90s) makes more sense than official canon. 10

When the parody is less warped than the canon, something is Wrong.

A contest entry

    : , Your review:

    Comment Suggestion: What is your your first impression?
    : Cost: 0 free left 0 points, You have 0. (?) (Line numbers)
    Ratings:

Comments


  • tonialoise
    November 10, 2008

    Edit | Reply
    Hehe... I was just talking to a friend about her books. I've only read the first two in the Pern series. And while I like them as a whole there was something about her style that I'm not too sure I like. I can't say it's continuity, but maybe it is as you said, the humans don't have a wide ranging personality. I don't know what it is. I'm still going to read more of her books and enjoy them, but it was interesting to see what you had to say about it.

    I love your last line!


    • intoothandclaw
      November 10, 2008
      Edit | Reply
      It's not as obvious in the first two; the only huge blip there is Lytol's dragon color mysteriously changing when he became a more important character. (I forgot to mention the homophobia rampant. For you see, male green riders are TEH GHEY, and she couldn't have Lytol be TEH GHEY -- so suddenly Larth became a brown, without a word of explanation! Go Go Stealth Retcon Action!)

      The more books you read, the more obvious it will become. Honestly, if you like the first two, keep going, because it's a fun *world*, but try not to be too pained by her mistakes.


  • WeAreOceansAway
    November 10, 2008

    Edit | Reply
    I personally have never read these books, but they sound like something I also would have read back when I was younger. It's a great rant because you make your point known without whining; you make great points.
    Thanks for the wonderful entry!

    • intoothandclaw
      November 10, 2008
      Edit | Reply
      I want to say they're worth a read, but they're also very frustrating. I enjoyed the sci-fi/fantasy blend, tho'.