The use of destruction to recreate power and order is so beyond savagery to work in anyway the government demands it to. In a system of dead intelligence, chaos is always in the mix. Though to say that the government is dense would be untrue, they are very ingenious authorities. I am addressing to the down sides of the war. They say that the war is a civil way to restore today's generation. For who? Us? We were NEVER in chaos. Yes, 9/11 did happen and Iraq was probably going to bomb again. But, to keep soldiers over there to imprison armed victims? This may sound silly and you'll probably chuckle at the sight of two leaders of the world doing this. But, why can't the president and his enemy play chess instead of war? I know that's stupid, but I don't see you coming up with anything else! Plus, the president is our LEADER, not a dictator. Shouldn't he be getting off his royal ass and do something instead of pushing everyone else to do his dirty work. We didn't do shit, he did. In conclusion, the world will fall in order yet again only to flop back into poverty. That's why it's called the SYSTEM.
A contest entry
- Going for Gold! by Neolittlefish.
150 points, ended October 21, 2008, 44 entries
• next story in this contest, remove from contest - Imagination by MidniteRockers.
370 points, ended December 17, 2008, 75 entries
• next story in this contest, remove from contest - Show off your talent X3 by xXSnickiesXx.
600 points, ended January 16, 101 entries
• next story in this contest, remove from contest
Comments
-
Has this got any describtion in it? Nice and short and straight to the point, which is what I liked. I, being honest, don't really find the war very ammusing, or presidents, but I quite liked the point you were getting across readers.
Good luck
Lolly x -
Well, I never approve of war because I'm a pacifist, but I liked the way you wrote this; it was well constructd. And if you were running for president and if I was American, then I'd vote for you!
Adding your comment:
