My Own Sweet Little Rant

My take on...

After reading a lot of 'rants' on the site, I've come to the conclusion that apparently everyone is supposed to like one book, and one book only. Kind of funky considering that this is a site based on literature, with thousands of diverse members.

Not sure what that book is, but apparently it's not Twilight.... or Harry Potter... or one of the thousands of other books that people read. Not really sure why, though. Could be because after reading it, people had the urge to kill themselves? Or run amok with a gun? Or maybe it was someone standing behind the reader with the gun, threatening to kill them if they didn't read the obviously crap book? Yeah, that's it!  Whooo! Case solved!

Might seem obvious, but... if you don't like a book while reading it, then... stop reading. Just like if you don't like a song, you'll turn it off or ignore it... tv show, change the channel. Unless a book needs to be read for a book report, then there's nothing making you finish it. And if you 'have' to finish it because you bought it, then maybe look upon the crappiness as a lesson that cost you the price of the book. Me, if I buy a book (although I mostly use the library to borrow), and I don't like it, then it gets closed until some other time, or I find someone to give it to.

Different tastes in literature is important. Who wants to be reading what someone else says they should read? That smacks of arrogance, and you (collective) deciding what's best for someone else's literary palate. Okay... you read a book and didn't like it. Darlin', if that's the worst thing that happens to you this week/month/year, then I say consider yourself lucky.

I read a lot. My tastes go from political intrigue to gothic to science fiction to mythology. Some of the books are good, others bad, while there are those that I skim through to get to the good parts. I've found little gems here and there that earn a permanent spot on my bookcase, while others get put down after read (or even during). I've read so called 'classics' that were so boring and mundane that I couldn't continue.

I never liked vampire/goth type stories. In fact, you could say that I'd rather shove my finger in my eye and swirl it around than read. But, I picked up a book in that genre one day, and to my surprise, liked it. I grabbed every book by the same author, and devoured them. Some were good, others I worked to remove from my memory... while another I couldn't even finish. 

I had people suggest books/authors that write in that genre, and some I like, others I don't. But I would never tell someone not to read those that I didn't like, or tell them that the author/books suck. It's their choice to read... just as it's my choice not to.

And when it all boils down, isn't the choice to peacefully read what you want one of the main reasons we all love books?

So go ahead, complain about that story! Curse the author, and the characters! But please, don't assume that just because you didn't like it, that others should accept your bitching about what may be 'their' favorite book... for I am sure that you have some gems in your collection that others think are quite pathetic and worthy of being placed at the bottom of a bird cage.

 

Add a comment

    : Comment:

Comments

1 - 11 of 11
  • First-Mate gold member
    May 30
    Edit | Reply
    Well said..er written.


  • CactusJack silver member
    December 3, 2008
    Edit | Reply

    Man

    there should be a way to give to columns. This was just great. As are your responses
    I agree with everything. To each his own. I commend you for getting as far as you did in a Harry Potter book. Unless there was some DaVinci code like clue to save the world, inside them I will never-ever read them. Not even close to my taste, BUT I don't condemn (well maybe a little) those who enjoy the books.

    I'm sure this column is in response to what I was thinking three months ago at the supermarket. (sorry, just poking fun @ Cory )

    Again awesome column, sorry I didn't see it sooner.

    Jack


    • Barbara Moderators member
      December 3, 2008
      Edit | Reply
      As far as I did with a Harry Potter book? That would be picking it up to move it to the side so I could see what was behind it on the shelf in the bookstore. (actually, I read the back, and tried the first few chapters, but... couldn't make it. Not my cop o' tea in the fiction department.) And I read a bit of the Twilight series about a week ago... gawd, was it terrible. Um, I mean. It wasn't for me, but kudos to anyone that liked it, and I hope you treasure the book. Any book you like is well worth the price.

      (I have to defend the Dark-Hunter books on other forums, so I know the feeling of people not liking a series, etc. Like I mentioned... to each his/her own.)


  • Oblivion Kitty God silver member
    October 27, 2008
    Edit | Reply
    I disagree to a point. Yes, if a book is not to a reader's liking, then it's a good idea to stop reading. But ask any critic if they enjoyed every single book they ever read and they will say no. But they finished every single book they wrote a review on. And, from my own view, the rants on this site are a type of review - albeit unprofessional - and thus are not so much about "bashing" a story as much as giving a view on the book that everyone else refuses to admit is logical.

    I understand different literary tastes. But when a a large group of people enjoy a book that is actually poorly written and only barely able to be considered a piece of literature, then there's some sort of mental problem somewhere.

    As for the skirting copyright thing (as mentioned in the comments), I do not believe that mentioning the name of a book in a rant or review is copyright infringement. Copyright infringement would be more like plagiarism.

    I do not like arguments or anything like that, but I saw this column and just knew that I needed to look it over. And even though I didn't agree with you, in order to give a proper comment that actually relates to the rant, I read the entire thing (much as I did with Twilight, I might point out).

    Now, those people who bash a book just to bash it, yeah, they need a new hobby. But a review and a bash are not the same.

    If anything must be changed about the rants/reviews/whatever on this site concerning other books or authors, is should not be anything related to columns as much as adding an entirely new feature: a system for reviews.

    But then, I thought that part of the premise of this site was not only writing and reading the stories written by the other members, but also the review and discussion of published books by non-members, as well.

    Pardon the annoyed-esque tone of this reply. But I'm a bit peeved at this column, and felt that it was only fair to have a comment that wasn't "100% agree" - not to be mean or down on the other two comments. I just think that there are two sides to any rant. I represent the other side at the moment.

    Anyway, it's a nicely and well-written little ramble.

    Oh, and I might make this small distinction. Just because a person makes a ranting review of a story does not mean that that person believes everyone else should agree with them.

    (You may snag a closer peek at my author's notes on my latest rant, which I've no doubt spawned this column, where I state the the only comments not desired were flames and spam.)

    I am sorry if you take this as a "fight" or whatever, I don't mean it that way. I just fiercely disagree with, what I considered, a very narrow-sighted rant against rants (not to mention the "oxymoronic" concept of such a column).

    Not to mention that this feels like a personal assault. This column relates to various rants across the site, I know. But the fact that it popped almost immediately after my own rant against Twilight by Stephenie Meyer (that should bypass any possible "copyright infringement").

    But, as I said, a well-written rant. And even, in its way, useful - if poorly timed.

    • Barbara Moderators member
      October 27, 2008
      Edit | Reply
      I shall have to read your rant to be able to see what it is I've spawned this from. (In other words... haven't read it yet. Which is surprising, since I've come across more than a few rants/reviews on books in the past week) I'm glad you represent the other side of the issue... it's wonderful to have two sides and all the facts to things. I can't comment on the things I haven't read, but I can comment on people slamming.... you've read the series, and can comment on them.

      I'm referring to the rants where people slam a book, and anyone that likes the book. "'Title of Book' sucks, and you're an idiot for liking it." type thing.

      Mentioning books does not infringe on the copyright part... I was referring to the idea of hosting a contest where people review books, which would most likely bring the prospect of someone copying parts of the book to show how bad or good it is. A lot of people include the ISBN of the book, and page numbers of small passages.

      No, a review and a bash are not the same, but most of the reviews I've seen on here have been bashing... in one way or another.

      "But when a a large group of people enjoy a book that is actually poorly written and only barely able to be considered a piece of literature, then there's some sort of mental problem somewhere." To be honest... I feel the same way about Harry Potter books. I couldn't get past the first few chapters. But, it's one of the best selling books in the world, and spawned major movies. Yet, people love the series and can't seem to get enough. The same can be said for Twilight fans. Why would there be a mental problem somewhere just because you didn't like the book?

      As for the idea of "But then, I thought that part of the premise of this site was not only writing and reading the stories written by the other members, but also the review and discussion of published books by non-members, as well." Storywrite is set up for the posting of stories for reviewing and improving. There are forum areas such as the writing one for discussion of stories, as well as group setting for it.

      Sorry if you assumed I was refering to you in any way... I wasn't. Like I mentioned at the beginning of this reply, I haven't read your review yet. I have it open in another window to read after I'm finished on this... and I must say I like your author notes... maybe I should have included that in this column. Then again, if someone doesn't agree, I'd prefer they let me know in a well thought out way(much like you have). For we both know that even if we don't agree with each other we won't be facing off at ten paces and shooting at each other. (although, we may a bit though )


  • ice wolf Greeters member
    October 27, 2008
    Edit | Reply
    I agree with you 100% on this Barb. Sure, a lot of people don't like the books that others like. One example, like you said, is Twilight. A lot of people say the first book stands good on its own, but the other books suck after that. The thing with that is, though, books in a series can't really stand alone. They all end in cliffies. I admit that some of the genres are overdone, but we should give the books a chance and not just say they suck because of genre, title, etc. Thanks for writing this.


  • Kari gold member
    October 27, 2008
    Edit | Reply
    Do you know I mainly like reading books that are movies. I just haven't found a favorite author yet another reason why I stay out of debates about authors lol. I love reading real diary like books about real people.
    Awesome column Barb

    • Barbara Moderators member
      October 27, 2008
      Edit | Reply
      I've read books that are movie, and books that continue after the movies. Some are wonderful! I've read books that were made into movies, and went at the way it was twisted and at times held nothing in common with the book past the title.

      Thanks I love reading people's reviews of books, but when it falls into a scathing slam against it, it seems that maybe they missed the whole point the book was aiming for. Either that, or they hated it from page one, and worked that hate throughout the whole thing. Then again, the book could have just sucked big time... I can't comment on tomes I haven't read yet.

      • Kari gold member
        October 27, 2008
        Edit | Reply
        Ya know a book review contest would be really need to have if you're able to hold one that is. Might get me into reading one.

        • Barbara Moderators member
          October 27, 2008
          Edit | Reply
          There's seem to be so many rant/review contests around lately. It's weird, really.... and sort of skirts copyright things when mentioning books . If people did it in a column, with acknowledgement, then somehow got it in to a contest, then it might work.

          Maybe I'll ask Kevin about the possibility of allowing columns into contests...


          • Kari gold member
            October 27, 2008
            Edit | Reply
            I'm now thinking about holding a diary contest

1 - 11 of 11