Forums / About Writing /
Introducing new main characters


  • Myryca
    Jul 31 7:59 AM
    Reply
    How late in a story is too late for introducing new, somewhat major characters?

    I've been thinking about this in relation to a novel I'm currently working on and I grew up having been taught that you need to set all your main characters up at the beginning of the story. It doesn't seem right to introduce major characters later down the track but the way my plot is working out, it will be some time before a couple of them can come into play.

    Does anyone have any thoughts or pointers?

  • ablelaz
    July 31

    Reply

    The story decides

    Hi Myryca---It is rather silly to assume all characters of merit must be introduced by a certain page in the book.

    Write your story and introduce the character as they venture into the story.

    Talk to you soon---ablelaz.

    • I think you hit the nail right on the head. Sometimes the long wait helps build up the character.

  • Marta
    July 31

    Reply
    Unlike Napoleaon you don't have to give everything up front in the beginning of the story. You can introduce maqin characters whenever you like because:

    1) it's your story and you're the one writing it and

    2)if it's in line with the story plot and you don't just have them appear out of thin air and introduce them somehow and not have it be jarring to the reader then go for it.

    I wrote a 60 Chapter novel and the main character didn't come into the story until I was thirty-five chapters into the novel and it worked out just fine.

    don't allow anyone to dictate how you write your stories...even if that is what you were taught you can break that mold if, you know how and are brave enough to do it.

    good luck.

  • Oddities
    August 1

    Reply
    Introducing all the characters in first chapter would overload the reader with too many people to remember. Thats an insane rule and i can't think of any books that follow it unless their is only one character.

    But saying that, the story needs still needs an antagonist / protagonist from the begining, even if they get replaced later on.

    • Myryca
      August 1

      Reply
      Mm, I don't really mean just in the first chapter... nor do I mean all the characters... Just the main ones.

      I guess my question is, is it okay to have main characters come into the story halfway through the book? Or even later than that?

      Wouldn't it be a little odd if they did? It'd be like having a murder mystery building up all the suspense about who the criminal is and then finding out at the end that it's someone you don't even know or haven't encountered. Or at least, that's what I feel it would be like. (Not necessarily with just the main protagonist/antagonist, Oddities, but with multiple major characters).

      Or what about third person stories where you change the point of view between main characters and then suddenly, 3/4 through the book, you're reading from the point of view of someone else? That just seems really odd to me.

  • Marta
    August 1

    Reply
    You seemed a bit confused about the whole issue: If it feels right then you should hold off and if it doesn't then you should introduce him/her in the beginning.

    It's not odd at all. Sometimes, the main characters needs to be introduced into the storyline by a lesser character...

    okay an examples: Wuthering Heights. Catherine is introduced by the maid as she tells that story to a supporting character, she is the main character but is not introduced right off.

    Other examples: Shakespeare's Hamlet.

    Mr.Kurtz in Joseph Conrad's: Heart Of Darkness who is introduced by Marlow.

    Herman Melville's: Moby Dick Ismael introduces Captain Ahab.

    Jane Austen's: Persuasion.

    The list goes on....it's just a matter of pacing and timing and not jarring the reader and introducing the supporting characters as such...they are like the foyers of a house before you get into the main room, understand?


  • Valkyrie
    August 1

    Reply
    I think it also depends on your personal definition of the word "main". If they affect the plot in a distinct way, like, without them there, many things would happen entirely differently or not at all, then they can be a main character no matter when they show up, IMO. The books I like to read have a whole pack of main characters, like six to a dozen or more. They can't possibly all show up at the start; there's simply not enough room.

    Usually you'll start off with someone or a few someones who will stick to the story the whole way through, but that's "usually". There's another term for the way things usually go: cliché. It's okay to break out and do your own thing, as long as you write it well.

    I've got 64 chapters of story where four characters show up at the start, then 15 chapters in, 2 more show up, then somewhere around chapter 30, another one shows up, and waaaay at the end, somewhere around chapter 50, you finally meet the last three. They're all essential to the plot, but by dint of the fact that the original characters have to travel to meet the rest of them, it's impossible to have them all there at the start, and if I wrote about them all from the beginning, I'd have a frigging trilogy of boringness. You want to stick with your plot; only write the stuff that actually moves the plot forward. If that means not talking about Joe Awesome until chapter 40, then I don't see any problem with that.


  • Marta
    August 2

    Reply
    Better advice you're not going to get anywhere else...now take the ball and run with it. Lol.

  • wolfcub
    August 17

    Reply
    if you can do another book...right at the end!
    seriously, chuck 'em in anywhere.
    mine generally appear on the page when they apear in my head, but i never plan more than one or two chapters ahead!

  • Lawrie
    August 17

    Reply
    In quite a few of Agatha Christie's 'Poirot' stories, the main man (Poirot) doesn't appear until later. The same with episodes I've watched of 'Columbo', most times he doesn't appear until after about the third ad break

    As Marta says, it's your book and your characters - you're the boss.

  • ursabear
    August 20

    Reply
    I read a lot of crime novels from the library and sometimes notice that the perp is introduced early but not identified. Nothing is told about who he/she is until the middle of the story. Maybe this is what you're looking for.

  • BlackDragon-
    October 13

    Reply
    Really...there isnt a wrong place to put a new character in a book, if its your book it is your idea. You can put a new character in when you feel its right.

  • FaIIen One
    October 14

    Reply
    As long as you allow time for the characters to develop (which can be as slow or fast as you like depending on how much focus you give them) you can introduce main characters as late as you like. Just remember to not rush into it, and let the characters build up to what you want them to become. If you cook a steak too fast, it'll char on the ourside and be raw in the middle. We don't want that.

  • the back row
    October 25

    Reply
    It's never too late to add a new character. Heck, I'd put someone new in the last chapter if it felt right. And I've seen that done, and done well.

    Put your character wherever the hell you want.
  • :